The Unassailable Right of Privilege

When we think about America today, it is almost impossible to imagine that at the time of our nation’s founding our forefathers endured a tyranny no less malevolent than that of even the most Orwellian of examples. It isn’t until one reads the Bill of Rights, and truly considers the conditions that would give rise to the need for a group to stand forth and claim such inalienable rights as to be secure in their persons, houses, and effects, to be not deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, to enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, that one begins to fathom the extent of their oppression. Even upon such mental exercise, it is difficult to imagine such conditions could ever exist here, for this is America, the freest nation in the world, and such immutable rights are simply assumed, as they are the very definition of freedom.

It seems unlikely then that any American would sacrifice these rights, for which so much has already been sacrificed, or that anything could ever infringe upon them, but unfortunately that is not the case. The comfortable mind has a short memory, and the sacrifices of others do not long affect its workings nor weigh heavily upon it. Contentment transcends conviction; temporal security supersedes some lofty ideal. At least such was the demonstration by our Senate when in 2012, under the inauspicious aegis that without these rights there exists some nation worth defending, it imbued the National Defense Authorization Act with language that allows for the indefinite detainment of any individual considered a threat to the very rights they have thereby suspended.

What is the purpose of a national defense that fails to defend the very precept of freedom that has historically distinguished the United States from the rest of the world? It can only be the defense of elite interest and the privilege that attends it.

Traitors to Democracy

Whoa, there.

I have been seeing some things online lately that give me pause. People seem to have forgotten that this is a free country, ruled by the demos. So let me clear this up.

You don’t have to do anything Donald Trump or Elon Musk or Robert Vought tell you to do. While they are clearly authoritarian, this is not a totalitarian state. Never has been. It is a free country, founded in liberty. Nathan Hale, Aaron Bushnell, and countless others have died ensuring it be so.

To be plain, you are dishonoring their sacrifice when you obediently toe the line drawn by some authoritarian telling you what to do.

There is nothing in the Constitution of this country that imbues authoritarians with the power to arbitrarily dictate to the citizens of the United States of America what they must do. The default state is that you are free to do as you choose. Yes, there are laws established by Congress, laws that we must generally abide by. But should you not, there is due process established in the Bill of Rights that must be followed in addressing your transgression.

Importantly, it is your responsibility to demand that the government, especially the Federal government, complies with the Bill of Rights. That, not a well-stocked Walmart, is the defining characteristic of a democracy. That you, the citizen, holds the government accountable to following the letter of the law.

A bunch of you, by ceding this responsibility, are traitors to democracy.

I challenge you to renew your commitment to democracy. Perhaps you agree with the sweeping changes that are occurring in this country currently. That is fine, even though they are mostly a smokescreen for blatant grift and larceny. But where you cross the line is in imagining that the President of the United States has any say whatsoever about how individuals live their lives.

I’m here to tell you, he (since you won’t elect a woman) doesn’t. The second you let him, this ceases to be a free country.

There is a notion that because a significant portion (31.6%) of the voting-eligible population cast their ballot for the ticket of Donald J Trump and JD Vance that this has somehow given these individuals a “mandate” to remake the United States of America. It has not.

To be clear, more people (36.5%) chose to abstain from this vote than voted for either candidate. What that actually indicates is that the majority of citizens do not desire the proposition regarding governance (i.e. the platform) forwarded by either of them.

In plain language, more people want to be free than want authoritarianism.

I hope that you are among them.